Monday, September 18, 2006

Spiritual Abuse

Spiritual abuse is a real phenomena. I've listed the 5 Common Characteristics below.

Please see this link for more information: http://www.watchman.org/profile/abusepro.htm




Spiritual Abuse
by David Henke

Founding Date: Spiritual abuse is as old as false religion itself. While the practice is old, the term "spiritual abuse" may have been coined first by Jeff VanVonderen.

Organizational Structure: Can occur under virtually any organizational structure, but "top down" hierarchical structures are especially well suited to systemic spiritual abuse.

DEFINED
Spiritual abuse is the misuse of a position of power, leadership, or influence to further the selfish interests of someone other than the individual who needs help. Sometimes abuse arises out of a doctrinal position. At other times it occurs because of legitimate personal needs of a leader that are being met by illegitimate means. Spiritually abusive religious systems are sometimes described as legalistic, mind controlling, religiously addictive, and authoritarian.

COMMON CHARACTERISTICS
#1) Authoritarian
The most distinctive characteristic of a spiritually abusive religious system, or leader, is the over-emphasis on authority. Because a group claims to have been established by God Himself the leaders in this system claim the right to command their followers.

This authority supposedly comes from the position they occupy. In Matthew 23:1-2 Jesus said the Scribes and Pharisees "sit in Moses' seat," a position of spiritual authority. Many names are used but in the abusive system this is a position of power, not moral authority. The assumption is that God operates among His people through a hierarchy, or "chain of command." In this abusive system unconditional submission is often called a "covering," or "umbrella of protection" which will provide some spiritual blessing to those who fully submit. Followers may be told that God will bless their submission even if the leadship is wrong. It is not their place to judge or correct the leadership - God will see to that.

#2) Image Conscious
The abusive religious system is scrupulous to maintain an image of righteousness. The organization's history is often misrepresented in the effort to demonstrate the organization's special relationship to God. The mistaken judgements and character flaws of its leaders are denied or covered up in order to validate their authority. Impossibly high legalistic standards of thought and behavior may be imposed on the members. Their failure to live up to these standards is a constant reminder of the follower's inferiority to his leaders, and the necessity of submission to them. Abusive religion is, at heart, legalism.

Abusive religion is also paranoid. Because the truth about the abusive religious system would be quickly rejected if recognized, outsiders are shown only a positive image of the group. This is rationalized by assuming that the religion would not be understood by "worldly" people; therefore they have no right to know. This attitude leads to members being secretive about some doctrines and the inner policies and proceedures of the group. Leaders, especially, will keep secrets from their members. This secrecy is rooted in a basic distrust of others because the belief system is false and can not stand scrutiny.

#3) Suppresses Criticism
Because the religious system is not based on the truth it cannot allow questions, dissent, or open discussions about issues. The person who dissents becomes the problem rather than the issue he raised. The truth about any issue is settled and handed down from the top of the hierarchy. Questioning anything is considered a challenge to authority. Thinking for oneself is suppressed by pointing out that it leads to doubts. This is portrayed as unbelief in God and His anointed leaders. Thus the follower controls his own thoughts by fear of doubting God.

#4) Perfectionistic
A most natural assumption is that a person does not get something for nothing. Apart from the express declarations of salvation by grace through faith God has given in the scriptures, it would be natural to think that one must earn salvation, or at least work to keep it. Thus, in abusive religions all blessings come through performance of spiritual requirements. Failure is strongly condemned so there is only one alternative, perfection. So long as he thinks he is succeeding in his observation of the rules, the follower typically exhibits pride, elitism, and arrogance. However, when reality and failure eventually set in, the result is the person experiences spiritual burnout, or even shipwreck of his faith. Those who fail in their efforts are labeled as apostates, weak, or some other such term so that they can be discarded by the system.

#5) Unbalanced
Abusive religions must distinguish themselves from all other religions so they can claim to be distinctive and therefore special to God. This is usually done by majoring on minor issues such as prophecy, carrying biblical law to extremes, or using strange methods of biblical interpretation. The imbalanced spiritual hobby-horse thus produced represents unique knowledge or practices which seem to validate the group's claim to special status with God.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Who writes this garbage? Take out the Christianese, and this could apply to any corporation, orginisation, government, or family for that matter.

For clairty, read the list with just the bullets:
#1) Authoritarian
#2) Image Conscious
#3) Suppresses Criticism
#4) Perfectionistic
#5) Unbalanced

Sounds like pretty much every authority figure in the known universe. So LFF is, at its worst, a bad Wal-Mart executive. Or at least a middle-manager who likes to steal red staplers. (heh, "Office Space" - now THAT'S a good movie!)

Anonymous said...

so...are you saying that it's ok for LFF to abuse members since the techniques are the same that some secular organizations use?

Anonymous said...

#1. This is not garbage. Follow the link to find out more about the scholarship.

#2. There is no "Christianese" in this document or loaded language. This is a scholarly work using scholarly language. (Why does this threaten you?)

#3. It is false to say that this can apply to any coporation, organization, government, or family.
(This premise has been inserted in order to mislead and create the strawman argument that follows.)

The truth can set you free. Denying the truth is an attempt to keep others (and yourself) in bondage.

Why are you so afraid of the truth?

Anonymous said...

wow! the 3:38 PM dude sounds like Pastor Karl...is that you PK?

David Henke wrote this article about spiritual abuse without ever knowing anything about LFF. But the shoe fits don't it?

this is cool stuff! As we used to say in the old days just "selah" on each of the five things one at a time.

3. is one of my favorites: Questioning anything is considered a challenge to authority.

Wasn't there a like a chart with terms like "levels to rebellion" or "road to disloyalty" or something like that?

Can anyone remember the right name?

JW

Anonymous said...

Dear 9-18 3:38 Poster,
I am sorry you have such a cynical view of the world that you think:
#1) Authoritarian
#2) Image Conscious
#3) Suppresses Criticism
#4) Perfectionistic
#5) Unbalanced
describes "pretty much every authority figure in the known universe". What has occured in your life to cause you to think this? If this is truly how you feel, your insentitivity to an article on Spiritual Abuse and any consideration that similar abuse was/is a problem at LFF is understandable. Perhaps you would find counseling helpful in developing a more generous and realistic view of legitimate authority. A view of proper and legitimate authority could help you realize that:
#1) Authoritarian
#2) Image Conscious
#3) Suppresses Criticism
#4) Perfectionistic
#5) Unbalanced
should not be expected in the church or in any other well-run organization.

Anonymous said...

9-18 7:21
Like your comment. The phrase you were searching for was "development of disloyalty". I had it read to me. Good times!

Anonymous said...

No, this is not PK. PK probably doesn't even use the Internet, and certainly doesn't care about this site.

And second, there is nothing scholarly about a web-only article from a hack book-seller like Watchman.org. They are a legitimate Christian org with some honest and good advice for the faith community. But scholarly they are not.

Anonymous said...

so you dismiss what they say because they don't fit your standard of "scholarly"? I doubt the pharasees saw Jesus as scholarly either, but the truth is the truth regardless of how many references you have in your bibliography.
May I also submit, that when you walk into Walmart you are not expected to press in and show your servants heart. You are not manipulated and made to feel like you are below standard. You can go in in your sweats, you don't have to have a certain body type, you don't even have to be clean! So, I think comparing this article to all corporate america is a poor choice.
Peace, John B.

Anonymous said...

As I reread the article, it does seem that they use highly charged words. It might have been better if they toned the verbage down just a smidge. I highly suggest that people interested in this read the book Twisted Scriptures. It is not written about LFF, but there are such strong simularities it is really hard to dismiss it. I also think that much of the leadership at LFF went in with good motives. I really believe that PK didn't start out saying "let's start an authoritarian christian cult". I can't look in his heart, but I believe that he really thinks he is (was)doing God's will.
Thank God that He still uses imperfect vessels, otherwise where would we all fit in? May God's grace fill all that we do and say.
Peace, John B.